More or Less · Topics · Episode #166

The Real Agent War Isn't Features — It's Trust vs. Distribution, and Google Might Win Both

From #166 — iPhone Duo, Meta Muse & Why AI Finally Scared Dave Morin · September 11, 2026 · 5:41 min · Jessica Lessin, Dave Morin, Brit Morin

Clip from the full recording, 23:52–29:33 · download mp4

Brit lays out why Google hasn't shipped its own agent yet (it's quietly building a harness across every product first) and why, when it does, its combination of trust and existing billion-user distribution beats Meta's superior ad business and OpenClaw's open-source purity.

Jess presses Brit on the real puzzle: everyone is racing to ship agents, so why has Google — sitting on the most products and the most user data — not shipped a unifying one yet? Brit’s theory: Google isn’t behind, it’s building a harness that spans every product safely, with real data-security and breach-liability stakes a company its size can’t skip. She predicts that once it ships, its billion-plus existing users make the adoption curve dwarf everything currently on the market.

Dave frames the real competitive matrix as two variables — trust and business model — and scores the field: Meta has a strong ad business but low trust; Google has both trust and a business model; Apple has extreme trust but (via Siri) no functioning product yet. Jess complicates the trust read, arguing OpenAI and everyone else has already fallen to roughly Meta’s trust level in the public’s eyes, so the industry has converged downward rather than Google standing uniquely above it.

Dave pulls Jess’s own reporting into the argument — Meta’s claim that Threads has passed X in usage, which nobody at the table doubts, underscoring that distribution power is real and durable even when trust is weak. He ties it back to OpenClaw’s own trajectory: its best week ever last week, growing fastest among people who explicitly refuse to hand data to a cloud vendor — proof, in his framing, that the “no trust required” on-prem/open-source lane is its own durable category, separate from the giants’ race.

Key points

• Brit's theory for Google's absence from the agent race: it's building a harness that spans every product, prioritizing data security given its scale, not falling behind.
• Dave's two-variable trust/business-model matrix: Meta (weak trust, strong business model), Google (strong on both), Apple (extreme trust, no functioning product — "it's called Siri").
• Jess's counterpoint: OpenAI and the rest of the industry has already converged down to roughly Meta's trust level in public perception.
• Dave cites Threads reportedly surpassing X in usage as proof that pure distribution power still wins regardless of trust.
• OpenClaw had its "biggest week ever" the week of this recording, driven partly by users who explicitly refuse cloud-based agents.
• Dave frames the current moment as still pre-breakthrough: even ChatGPT tops out around a billion users versus six billion mobile phone users worldwide.

Where they landed

Quotes

“There's no one better in the world at distribution than Meta, period... but they have much lower trust, right?”— Dave

“It already has billions of people using it. So the adoption curve is gonna just blow these instincts and towns of the world away as soon as it launches.”— Brit

“OpenAI has low trust, everyone has low trust. So it's sort of like the industry has come down to Meta's level.”— Jessica

Suggested tweets

All topics · Full episode #166 + transcript · Subscribe on YouTube · Spotify