More or Less · Topics · Episode #167
Sam's Take: New York Is the Most Attractive City on Earth
Clip from the full recording, 40.0–2:44 · download mp4 · watch at this point on YouTube
Back from the pool house, Sam declares New York 'the most attractive city on earth' — Central Park loops, US Open energy — while Brit demands to know what percent of those runners are on peptides and stakes out LA.
The cold open: Jess welcomes Sam back and asks how New York is, and Sam answers with a full civic thesis — maximum great weather, everyone running, everyone fit, ‘the level of talent in New York is just unbelievable.’ Brit counters that LA is hotter and wants a guys/girls split ranking plus a peptide census of Central Park; Dave notes New Yorkers ‘didn’t need peptides to be hot.’ Sam lands on the framing that cities are self-fulfilling prophecies — San Francisco for tech, New York for everything else — and Jess closes the segment by noting this is what she comes home to.
Key points
- Sam: New York is 'the most attractive city on earth' — great weather, Central Park loops, US Open afterglow.
- Sam's actual thesis: cities are self-fulfilling prophecies — SF for tech, NY for everything else.
- Brit disputes with LA and demands separate rankings for men and women plus a peptide count.
- Dave, diplomatically: New York was hot before peptides existed.
Where they landed
Quotes
“San Francisco is a self-fulfilling prophecy for tech. New York is a self-fulfilling prophecy for a lot of other things.”— Sam
“I just wanna know what percent are on peptides right now.”— Brit
“They didn't need peptides to be hot in New York City.”— Dave
Suggested tweets
Sam Lessin's grand unified theory of cities: SF is a self-fulfilling prophecy for tech, New York is a self-fulfilling prophecy for everything else.
Tweet this →The More or Less cold open this week: is New York the most attractive city on earth, and what % of Central Park runners are on peptides?
Tweet this →All topics · Full episode #167 + transcript · Subscribe on YouTube · Spotify